People in the world look at Google and see a behemoth. They see a company that has surpassed Microsoft in terms of power and influence. And they might very well be right. However, Google isn’t going to take over the United States and eventually the world. In fact, it takes hits just like every other company out there. In this case, it failed to secure some of the personal details of its employees and it the most recent company to note that it has suffered a data breach.

In this case, Google is really a victim as much as are the people whose information was stolen. Google uses Colt Express Outsourcing Services to take care of certain human resource functions. Therefore, when the office of Colt was broken into, it was Google information and that of other companies that was stolen. What is even worse about the May 26 break-in was that Colt does not encrypt its data, so whoever perpetrator the crime has nothing standing in between them and the personal information of Google employees. This information contains social security numbers, names, and addresses. This breach also affected CNET Networks.

As more details about this breach have come forward, it is clear that the stolen information does not contain any credit card numbers. However, a name, address, and social security number of an individual is more than enough for a criminal to open up a fake credit card account, although the charges end up being far too real for those affected by the crime. People, not only those impacted by the Colt burglary, have been turning toward subscriptions with ID theft services, such as Lifelock. Lifelock contacts all three credit bureaus, Trans Union, Equifax, and Experian and monitors credit reports for activity that includes credit card and loan applications. Whenever one of these is filed, Lifelock contacts its customer to make sure that the application is legitimate.

In the case of this specific breach at Colt, Google has said that it will pay for a year’s subscription with an identity theft service, both for its employees and the employees at CNET. Colt is not able to provide this same guarantee because it is going through financial difficulties. Those affected by this breach are those Google employees hired before December 31, 2005. Google only recently realized that its employees were at risk and has sent out letters alerting people of the danger to their private data. Google has also announced that it no longer has any association with Colt and that the company does not currently handle human resource material for the internet giant. Google has said that its separation from Colt took place long before the burglary was reported.

It is not a good time to be a student at Columbia University.  This is a report about the second data breach that they’ve suffered in the last 12 months.  And it is the same type of problem.  All in all, the problem revolves around access to social security numbers.  For some reason, the university doesn’t seem to recognize the importance of keeping this data secure.  Perhaps the school’s administration hasn’t heard of the crime known as identity theft.  Maybe they have and just don’t care.

What has set the students into an uproar was the announcement that 5,000 of their social security numbers have been available on an online database that anyone could access.  Not only was the data on the web, but it was also in a searchable format, which leaves the door open for even more specifically malicious activities.  The topper though, if that is possible, is that the breach has been occurring for the last 16 months.  Over that time period, there is no figure for how many people have accessed the data.  There is also a lack of accountability among the network security administrators of the university.

Students were alerted in an email on Tuesday to bring the matter to their attention.  The university found out about the breach when an alumni contacted the school about the website.  Apparently a student in the housing department posted the material without realizing that it was unsecured.  Upon request, Google took down the website and the university believed that the threat had been contained.  Unfortunately, on Wednesday, students alerted university officials that the data for over 200 students was still available.  A petition has begun circulating around campus to show the discontentment of the student body with what appears to be an inept administration.  This is only emphasized when people think back to a similar problem that developed in April 2007 in the housing department.  Demands listed in the petition involve criminal investigations behind the people responsible for posting the private data online, in addition to a detailed description of how the university plans to increase their electronic security.

While university officials have sworn to not rest until this issue gets resolved and the security features of all Columbia systems updated, no one appears to be holding their breath.  The university has agreed to provide subscriptions to ID theft services for two years.  These companies, such as Lifelock, monitor all three credit bureaus for illicit activity.  For a nominal fee, that the university is picking up in this specific case, customers are alerted whenever a new loan is opened or a credit card application is filed.  These ID theft services are available on a personal basis too and not just for people involved in large sized data breaches.